Jack Burns Lives!

So I’m in the pool today, doing laps in a large lane on the edge of the pool. Sharing with three older ladies doing their water wing workout, which is basically just floating and rotating your arms every once in a while as you gossip and discuss world affairs.

The topic du jour is socialism and how Obama is going to raise taxes and spend our money like there’s no tomorrow. The end result being socialism.

“I know what socialism looks like,” exclaims one.

“Yeah, me too. And they’re opening the borders to Mexicans who aren’t even going to have to pay taxes but will get tax refunds.”

As I caught bits and pieces of this blather, I couldn’t help but think of the irony of the situation, as they splashed about and enjoyed themselves in a well run community owned facility. Owned by me and the other citizens of Germantown. Kind of a socialist setting, but I guess I shouldn’t really tell them that. They might think the place was going to be overtaken by jackbooted thugs dressed in olive drab uniforms. Or worse yet, Mexicans. Oh my!

There seems to be a lot of this paranoia floating about, fueled in part by a not-so-clever propaganda campaign from the far right. Rush Limbaugh and that nitwit Senator of ours, Marsha Blackburn. Do whatever it takes, including telling blatant lies, to discredit Obama and anything “liberals” try to do to fix the mess Bxxx and his high rolling Wall Street buddies got us into.

It started in the campaign, of course, all this ridiculous, baseless labeling and name calling, and it’s continuing today. It’s designed to create fear, because as Herman Goering once stated all you have to do is create fear in the populace, and you can then do about whatever you want.

Not that I totally agree with all that Obama is doing. I don’t. Spending more, taxing more and fueling Wall Street in an effort to get credit flowing again, is a myopic strategy that simply won’t work, and the reason it won’t work is because the fundamental premise of how our economy should function is flawed. Deeply flawed. Those Chicago School boys ain’t done us any favors.

But eventually, man will learn that nature is the final arbitrator of things. Not Wall Street, not Washington, not the Democrats nor the Republicans. And no, not “god” either. God, if there is such a thing, doesn’t care about our economic system.

I pose this challenge to anyone that fancies themselves a seasoned debater and knowledgeable about economics. Please tell me how the “growth economy” can continue ad infinitum? Just do the math. Simple math. Apply a little biology and geology, and your argument is cooked.

Getting back to the problem at hand, though. Is Obama a socialist? What is a socialist? Someone that believes the means of production should be owned by the producers? An employee owned company? A cooperative? Yes, those are socialist enterprises, and there are many, many examples of where they work very well. Much better than our current investment community. Better than many banks.

But Obama is no socialist. Obama raised an incredible amount of money from Wall Street. Far more than McCain did. He’s got some very powerful, wealthy, mega-capitalist friends, so let’s not go off the deep end and start believing he’s another Hugo Chavez. Please. Spare me and stop embarrassing yourself by saying this stuff. You look like you get all your information from Rush Limbaugh and didn’t spend a second studying anything outside of business school.

My guess is we’re headed for even deeper serious economic troubles, and the right will jump on Obama. They’ll say he’s not fixing the problem their side created, and honestly, there may be some truth to that argument. However, he’s doing far more than Bxxx did to help everyone, not just the rich and powerful. And he can at least deliver a solid speech without slaughtering the English language.

Obama also obviously knows a lot of things I don’t, so I’m inclined to sit back and hope for the best. Perhaps he’s right and this is the best short term strategy. He’s smart, seems to really care about people, and he’s very likable. The bottom line is the jury is still out. Let’s give the guy a chance.

My solution? Oh….

I think we do need a stimulus package, but I want to retrain workers and put them in public works projects committed to developing alternative energy and expanding the passenger rail system around the country. That, and a public works project focused on rebuilding local communities and making them sustainable. Perhaps a new and more hip version of 4-H that teaches kids real life skills. Craftsmanship, gardening, food preparation, personal finance, how to build and maintain bikes, how to form and run effective community organizations, etc. Skills that will teach people how to really solve their own problems without depending on Washington or even their local governments.

Suck a billion or so out of the military (does anyone really think that any country is a match for our military, even with a massive cut…oh, and the Marines are another example of a government run program that works pretty well), and put it into education. A complete rework. Let’s fund the hell of out of it and do something worthwhile for our kids. Would you rather educate them or just keep sending them off to fight economic wars so they can get shot to pieces?

Why is that such a difficult choice? I mean, do you really feel threatened by a foreign power? I don’t, but what keeps me up at night and worries the hell out of me is millions upon millions of functional illiterates roaming our streets, many of which end up turning to violence after they’re left off the cruise ship.

And no, we don’t need to don citizens suits and start marching lock step through the streets reciting manifestos. We just need to roll up our sleeves and get to work.

ONWARD

Who really thought Obama’s stimulus plan was going to work? Even Obama supporter Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and now teaching global economics and management at MIT’s Sloan School of Management is a huge doubter. During an interview with Bill Moyer’s, he stated that he hadn’t seen any evidence that Geithner was going to break with the elites that got us into so much trouble.

It’s simply more of the same, “happy motoring” as Kunstler puts it. Borrow, spend and grow. Blind allegiance to a failed, non-sustainable economic system completely out of touch with biology and therefore, reality.

The solution? A steady state economy bound by biological and geophysical limits. A system that provides fair and consistent returns in a mixed economy of capitalist and socialist enterprises. Corporations, cooperatives, employee owned businesses and even some nationalization, where nationalization makes sense. A system that doesn’t destroy the biosphere, mountaintops, rivers and streams.

It can be done, but first, we have to get past this ridiculous notion that if we “ain’t growin’, we’re dyin’”

In fact, the opposite is true. If you want to guarantee collapse and death, keep believing in growth economics.

Steady-State Economy: Light at the End of the Tunnel
by Chuck Burr
17 February 2009
The growing economic meltdown is a wake-up call that our infinite growth bubble has burst. After the house of cards finishes falling, there will be only one viable economic solution left standing: a steady-state economy.
Insolvency Crisis

The world economy is essentially broke. U.S. daily bankruptcy filings have risen from about 1,300 in January 2006 to about 5,000 in September 2008.

Here is how big the problem really is. First, the value of all the money in the world until recently was three times greater than the value of all physical goods and services. In other words, our “money” is actually worth 30 cents on the dollar. And considering, physical assets such as real estate have been over valued, your pixel money is actually “worth-less.”

Second, the U.S. government’s $9.7 trillion commitment to solving the financial crisis amounts to almost two-thirds of the value of everything produced in the U.S. last year. The promises are composed of about $1 trillion in stimulus packages, around $3 trillion in lending and spending and $5.7 trillion in agreements to provide aid.

Third, until recently our growing economy has been able to cover our debts and deficits, but now the blue-light-special lifestyle is over. Everyone, from the public to governments is now under water. America has built up a staggering amount of debt. At the time of the 1929 stock market crash, total U.S. debt was 176 percent of GDP. Before the current financial crisis began, total debt stood at a whopping 304 percent of GDP. Today it is far worse; we are well beyond our means.

The next bubble to burst will be pensions. America’s 500 largest companies have a deficit of $200 billion in their pension plans. If the Dow hits 4,000, the deficit would rise to $400 to $500 billion. Companies will stop contributing and reduce payouts when forced to make a choice between payroll, corporate jets, and pension contributions.

Bailout Liquidity Makes Situation Worse

If the world financial crisis is really one of global insolvency, adding liquidity in the form of more government debt is actually dangerous. If I have a successful business and I borrow money for a temporary cash flow problem, no problem. But, if I am actually insolvent, increasing my debt by borrowing more money makes the situation worse for both me and the lender who will lose their investment in my soon to be bankrupt business.

Because of their size, the bailouts may ignite hyperinflation from all of the liquidity that is being generated out of thin air. Since the financial crisis began last year, the money supply has been nearly doubled out of thin air. Hyperinflation may cause the $50 trillion derivative markets to explode. The credit default swaps would be the first to blow driving interest rates to double digits which would light the fuse to the $50 trillion interest rate swaps supernova [more on this subject in a follow-up article - ed.].

Wasted Opportunity

Since World War II, we have produced little of value, but built a huge pile of debt upon debt. Europeans invaded what was an entire unspoiled continent 517 yeas ago, and today we have little of real value to show for it except a lot of people and a trashed ecosystem. What was once a vast expanse of fertility and old growth biodiversity from sea to shining sea is now an input-dependent monoculture wasteland. Take a ride on an plane while you still can and look down. Almost everything coming out of big-box stores is soon destined for the dumpster and our spread out suburban infrastructure will prove to be a liability as peak oil eliminates happy motoring.

Bernard Madoff’’s $50 billion ponzi scheme revealed how our Taker economic system really works. The problem is bigger than just our institutions such as fractional reserve banking, the Federal Reserve, and the looming derivative bubble. Our entire Taker culture is based on little of value. Growth, debt, greed, concentration of wealth, something for nothing, depleted resources, and overpopulation are not assets—they are liabilities. If we are to ultimately thrive, we must contribute to biodiversity, not destroy it.

Long History

We have actually had this “value-less” system that Daniel Quinn calls our Taker culture for 10,000 years since the agricultural revolution. Ever since it became OK to lock up the food, privatize land, concentrate wealth, make war, and for a minority to control the majority we have been impoverished. As long as we had abundant enough natural resources and a low enough population, the Taker ponzi scheme worked. We kept consuming the world to keep everybody happy. But, now we have overshot the earth’s carrying capacity.

Steady-State Economy

When all of the cards are done falling, local powered-down steady- state economies will be the only replacement for our infinite growth global consumer economy. To live within our means for perpetuity means living within the earth’s carrying capacity which we have vastly reduced especially over the last 100 years.

Economic growth is a threat because it assumes a growth in population, production, and consumption within our finite planet. A steady-sate economy has a constant stock of capital that is maintained by a rate of output no higher than the environment can absorb. Even banks can lend only as much money as they have.

In a steady-state economy, society focuses on more noble goals than economic growth. The late Masanobu Fukuoka asked “Why do you have to develop? If economic growth rises from 5 percent to 10 percent, is happiness going to double? What’s wrong with a growth rate of 0 percent? Isn’t this a rather stable kind of economics? Could there be anything better than living simply and taking it easy?”

Our economic measurement systems are a shell game. Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness is a better indicator than our Gross Domestic Product (GDP). GDP counts goods and services, but ignores the important things such a clean water, fresh air, public health, and biodiversity. GPD also lumps everyone together. If executive pay goes from 100 times average wages to 1,000 times, while real middle classes wages are falling, GDP does not show that. Concentration of wealth, externalized costs, depleted resources are invisible.

A sustainable economy requires a stable population, lower per capita consumption, and reduced complexity. In fact, since human population has overshot the earth’s carrying capacity by over 20 percent, our population and the economy are going to have to be significantly reduced size before true stability can occur. See Chapters 3 and 4 of Culturequake for an in-depth discussion of our population explosion and overshoot.

Also, since human population is in overshoot, taking more resources than the earth can generate, future carrying capacity will continue to be eroded. Imagine how great a population North America could have supported with all of our old-growth forests, topsoil, watersheds, and biodiversity intact? Now, half our topsoil is gone, much of what’s left is dead mineral matter only able to supporting crops through fossil fuel fertilizers, watersheds and fisheries are collapsing, the Ogallala aquifer supplying farmers from the Dakotas to Texas will be depleted in forty years, and global warming is ending stable weather. I’ll stop there.

Invest Locally

President Obama’s Herculean effort to revive the consumer economy is about as useful as a bucket-brigade on the Titanic. I have great respect for president Obama’s comitment and abilities, but he still clings to the illusion that “growth” is still possible with dwindling resources and a burgeoning population.

Other than feeding unemployed people and keeping them in their homes, the rest of the money would be better spent rebuilding our big-box bombed-out local communities, our railroads, and start Cuban-style urban agriculture and land reformation. Urban agriculture feeds half the people in Havana and 80 to 100 percent of people in smaller cities. Bank deposits should be insured and insolvent banks allowed to fail.

This will probably be last time we will be able to muster this level of resources; the last time people will lend us this much money. Our resource base is a shadow of what it was 100 years ago and our population has grown six times. I am saddened to see what is ultimately my children’s tax dollars squandered trying to revive the rusting, sinking hulk of our industrial economy.

Because our elected leaders and the media do not realize that we are entering the twilight of modern culture, they have not leveled with the people. Thus the people are not ready for the kind of cultural change we are going to see over the next century. It takes a crisis like this to be the wake-up call.

Economic Decline Can Be a Good Thing

Earnest Callenbach wrote in Ecotopia that a financial panic can be turned into an advantage if in the end society can be focus its energy, knowledge, and skills to what is really important in life. With the ensuing flight of capital, the factories, farms, and other productive facilities would fall into the people’s hands like ripe plums. Whole markets should be reorganized, no one or no corporation should be able to own more than say 40 acres. In fact, corporations should only exist for public projects such as roads or utility infrastructure and be de-chartered when the project is completed.

Our economy will be reshaped by many influences including re- localization, new-urbanism, peak oil, and learning lost horticulture and craft skills. Powering-down will happen discontinuously. We will rest at a plateau for a while and then drop to the next lower energy and complexity level. Governing institutions would be more useful if realigned along bioregion and watersheds lines—not in a continent- sized country made up of arbitrary squares.

Where to Begin?

Start where you are now and live your truth. Act from a sense of passion and joy. Plug into your local community; offer your skills and resources to sustainability efforts. Use your creative imagination. Ask yourself, “how can I partially or completely unplug from the wage economy in the next three years?” By doing so you will meet like- minded people. If people see you as sharing what you have, they will share with you.

Turn off your TV and tune into your family, friends, and neighbors. Educate yourself about useful skills such as permaculture. You are better off living near a community on a good piece of land that you own in a yurt than you are buying a house with a mortgage that the bank owns.

Seek a new vision and a new lifestyle. Instead of recycling, how can my waste become another’s food? Instead of debt, how can I simplify? Instead of mining topsoil how can I build it?

Humans are meant to take their modest place in a seamless web of life, disturbing that web as little as possible. This means sacrificing present complexity and consumption, but it ensures future survival. People should be happy not to the extent that they exploit their fellow man and creatures, but to the extent they live in balance with them.

Starting this spring, Culturequake essays will begin to describe our own personal journey to re-localize on our small permaculture farm in Ashland, OR. We will share our experiences with soil food web building, food forest design, installation, harvest, appropriate technology, and community education.

For years, I’ve held the believe that growth capitalism, unbridled growth, growth without any biological or geophysical limits, was at the core of our environmental crisis. But at the root of that problem, is private ownership of land.

Too radical for you? Well, other systems have been successfully managed on this planet for thousands of years, even on this continent. Our system is a brash, non-sustainable upstart, doomed to failure unless we make some adjustments and quickly.

Land and property ownership is how real wealth is built, and in the wrong hands, the results are easy for all to see. Strip mining, the recent disaster in East Tennessee, non-sustainable ranching, over-development in suburban areas, resort communities, where the development of multi-million dollar homes drives up land values and essentially forces long term locals out, etc.

It’s abuse. Abuse of the land and it leads to systems of hierarchy and abuse of the less fortunate because many wealthy people (not all) use their power as a cudgel against others.

There’s a strong case for a return to the commons. It’s a popular idea in bioregional groups and think tanks, and Gary Snyder has argued eloquently and persuasively for it in his work The Practice of The Wild.

I believe capitalism can survive, but with changes. It must be bound within biological and geophysical constraints and we need a return to the commons. We need a biophysical economic system.

———

Usufruct: End Private Property to Solve the Financial Crisis and Create Food Security
by Chuck Burr
03 February 2009
Locking up the land has been a great way to concentrate wealth, and for a minority to dominate the majority. In England .28 percent of the population owns 64 percent of the land. In the United States the top one percent of the population now owns more than the bottom 95 percent. But it is time to end private property.

We know that the needs of the natural world are more important than the economic system, but privatization sees it the other way around. Privatization of land implies the right of the “owner” to use the land in any way he/she/it sees fit including despoiling the land to “make a profit” at the expense of the local community and all other species. Native communities know this and do not voluntarily give up their common resources on which their communities depend until their communities have been destroyed.

Privatization has led to land use “for profit” and not “for community.” Our suburban system is at the heart of our economic problems and is the single greatest waste of resources in the history of the world. Privatization has led to a living arrangement with no future.

The rest is here.